The Anti-Jared has a good post right now. His point is that you can't cheat your body. It knows if you have been treating it well or not. You can eat badly for a few days and not gain, but if you do it all the time, you will. At a minimum, you will feel less well. Have a look: http://theantijared.com/2011/07/the-house-always-wins.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheAnti-jared+%28The+Anti-Jared%29
To that end, I'm down to about where I was pre-hospital weight. Mostly, I have been watching portion sizes and eating good food. Real food. No doughnuts. If you look at www.refusetoregain.com (at the right side of this page), you will see that the writer emphasizes the importance of the quality of the calories one ingests, not just the number. Her theory is based on insulin load in response to certain foods. She does not believe it's a zero sum game. I 'm not sure I do, either.
When I was in my recent doughnut phase, I don't think I ate an extra 10,500-14,000 calories in a couple of weeks (3-4 pounds). I really don't. But I do think that the fried, carbo-goodness of doughnuts wrecked havoc on my body's blood sugar. (Note: I am not diabetic, knock wood.) In less than a month, I was up a solid six pounds. I started eating better (not really much less, either), drinking more water, too, and I'm back down. (I guess it's possible that I was just "impacted," if you know what I mean. It's possible that dehydration was making me retain water. Either way, it was a decent reminder that eating good food is a reward in itself.
I have been frustrated at the stagnancy of my loss. But staying the same doesn't suck, given my history. So I'll keep doing what I'm doing, and I'll get back to the gym.
Speaking of, I haven't been to the gym much in the last seven weeks or so. One baby came home from the hospital last Wednesday, and I think the other one will come home tomorrow or Tuesday. It's made for a crazy sleep schedule, and it's hard for me to get to the gym when I can barely see straight. But I'll get back. Everything I read says you can't exercise away a bad diet, so I'm going to focus on eating in a healthy way for now and hit the gym when I can.
Showing posts with label Refuse to Regain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Refuse to Regain. Show all posts
Sunday, July 31, 2011
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Stuck
So, I was talking to my stepson earlier, and I told him that I was frustrated that my weight is the same now as it was in October. He gave me a gift--pointing out that I've had a lot going on (including the holidays) since then. I told my wife about it, and she said I've said the same thing several times. I guess I forgot.
I keep trying to remember that in my world, not gaining is a win. So I guess I'm winning.
Still.
I got a copy of Barbara Berkeley's book, Refuse to Regain: 12 Tough Rules to Maintain the Body You've Earned. Her website is linked at right. This book and website are really geared toward maintenance, but I figure it can't hurt to see what the future looks like, especially since I'm basically maintaining right now. She thinks--and this is probably somewhat controversial--that weight loss and gain are not limited to calories in/calories out.
Her thesis:
"...Foods that stimulate insulin [cause problems]. Insulin causes fat storage and traps fat in the fat cells so that it cant be released. Cutting out all carbs except for vegetables and low sugar fruits is essential. That includes whole grains. And by the way, the weight you lost will come back if you reintroduce these foods!"
Dr. Berkeley is a weight loss physician with the Cleveland clinic. She's no slouch. She advocates what she calls a Primarian diet for weight maintenance. This is a diet based on human genetics. We did not evolve to eat most carbs--grains, sure, but also beans, tubers, and other starchy foods. These cause insulin resistance in fat people or previously fat people, and lead to gaining weight. That's the simple explanation, but the full discussion is not much more complicated than that. Just as you'd feed a lion only raw meat, you should feed yourself what you evolved to eat. This is a pre-agrarian thing. Agriculture is only 10,000 years old. We have not had time to evolve to eat post-agriculture cuisine. Eat only what you could find in the woods. Lean meat, fish, fowl, nuts, veggies, most fruits.
Well, that's limiting. But I've been reading about the glycemic index for years. I can see the connection. So I'm going to try to eat in a Primarian way. But not stupidly. I still think you have to eat enough (at least your BMR, and probably a bit more). Here's the thing. If you don't eat carbs (or not much), it's HARD to eat a lot of calories. An eight ounce chicken breast is 260 calories. If I am supposed to be eating 2700 calories, it's going to be a trick to eat a lot of clean food. I'm going to give it a shot. That's a lot of veggies and chicken. But what else am I doing? (And I think I'm feeling better, so the gym beckons.)
I keep trying to remember that in my world, not gaining is a win. So I guess I'm winning.
Still.
I got a copy of Barbara Berkeley's book, Refuse to Regain: 12 Tough Rules to Maintain the Body You've Earned. Her website is linked at right. This book and website are really geared toward maintenance, but I figure it can't hurt to see what the future looks like, especially since I'm basically maintaining right now. She thinks--and this is probably somewhat controversial--that weight loss and gain are not limited to calories in/calories out.
Her thesis:
"...Foods that stimulate insulin [cause problems]. Insulin causes fat storage and traps fat in the fat cells so that it cant be released. Cutting out all carbs except for vegetables and low sugar fruits is essential. That includes whole grains. And by the way, the weight you lost will come back if you reintroduce these foods!"
Dr. Berkeley is a weight loss physician with the Cleveland clinic. She's no slouch. She advocates what she calls a Primarian diet for weight maintenance. This is a diet based on human genetics. We did not evolve to eat most carbs--grains, sure, but also beans, tubers, and other starchy foods. These cause insulin resistance in fat people or previously fat people, and lead to gaining weight. That's the simple explanation, but the full discussion is not much more complicated than that. Just as you'd feed a lion only raw meat, you should feed yourself what you evolved to eat. This is a pre-agrarian thing. Agriculture is only 10,000 years old. We have not had time to evolve to eat post-agriculture cuisine. Eat only what you could find in the woods. Lean meat, fish, fowl, nuts, veggies, most fruits.
Well, that's limiting. But I've been reading about the glycemic index for years. I can see the connection. So I'm going to try to eat in a Primarian way. But not stupidly. I still think you have to eat enough (at least your BMR, and probably a bit more). Here's the thing. If you don't eat carbs (or not much), it's HARD to eat a lot of calories. An eight ounce chicken breast is 260 calories. If I am supposed to be eating 2700 calories, it's going to be a trick to eat a lot of clean food. I'm going to give it a shot. That's a lot of veggies and chicken. But what else am I doing? (And I think I'm feeling better, so the gym beckons.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)