I should have knocked wood after writing the post about my (lack of) health problems. It turns out that I have a herniated disc somewhere in the lumbar region. Family history (dad, sister) of those, plus my symptoms and my weight all suggest a disc. The doctor mentioned my weight a couple of times in talking about it. He was not unkind. In fact, he's nicely marbled himself.
But weight has plenty to do with back problems. The weight is an additional burden on a skeleton not designed to carry heavy loads. I had muscle spasms several times when I was 80 pounds heavier than I am now. They went away as I dropped. This time, the problem felt totally different. Not muscular.
The disc problem appeared Wednesday night. I didn't sleep much that night or Thursday, because I couldn't get comfortable. Thanks to some heavy duty pain and muscle relaxing meds, I've been able to sleep. But the problem hasn't gone away, and I'll probably have to do some physical therapy. The doctor also said not to go to the gym. I actually like the gym. I wonder if the PT will believe that I can (and do) stay on the elliptical for up to an hour.
But I'm trying to look on the bright side. Part of fixing this without surgery is strengthening the core. I could use some help learning how to do that. The real hard part will be losing weight without being able to move much. I don't want to make the injury worse. That would be counterproductive over the long haul.
I'm considering moving to straight calorie counting from WW points. I think I have a handle on eating healthy, for the most part. I want a more accurate measure of what I'm eating. Calories are pretty much a zero-sum game. Since I've been on a plateau for a long time (except this week--see below) , I want to change things up. I learned today that if I'm tired and in pain, a buffet is a bad place for me to go. Heh. I'm over by about 350 calories for the day. It's not going to break me, but I'm not thrilled. I ate kind of mindlessly at lunch. It didn't seem to be that big a lunch, but I hit a lot of high-fat foods. Carnitas. Carrot cake. That kind of thing.
Finally, I didn't weigh in today. This was in part because of my back. It was also (if I'm being honest) that I put on some weight. I expected to this week. It was the week of my anniversary, and we went out to eat and had plenty of cake. But I didn't want to face it, either. Call me a wuss.
That's it. We'll see how the week goes.
A 45-year-old fat man trying to find his inner skinny dude.
Showing posts with label points. Show all posts
Showing posts with label points. Show all posts
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Plateau
Weight Watchers says you're in a plateau if you lose less than half a pound for six weeks. I'm not quite that patient. I've been hovering now for about five weeks. In fact, I haven't lost all that much all summer. It's mostly been consistent, but not much. I'm hoping for and average of 1.5 a week, or at least 1.3. I don't think that's crazy--I'm a big guy. But it's been a pound over the last five weeks. Total. So, what to do?
I've been reading a lot about weight loss. I'm particularly interested in how contrary to evolution that it is. We have adapted to put on weight easily so when times are tough, we don't die. Losing weight is contrary to that adaptation. (If you don't believe in evolution, I can't help you.) In fact, to lose weight consistently, you don't have to cut calories much. A couple of hundred a day will do it, depending on where you start.
Plateaus happen, I understand, when one's body finally tumbles to the fact that there's less food coming in than there was before. Then it slows the metabolism to adjust. The way to deal with this is to keep moving and to--wait for it--eat more.
More?
More.
You can also alter how much you eat by day, while keeping the same total points/calories for the week. That's called, I think, the zigzag.
I have been eating 44 WW points (and some of the weekly, depending on the week) since April. At 58 calories per point (average), that's about 2550 calories. That's plenty. But according to a couple of calculators I have used online, my BMR is more like 2700 calories. This means even in a coma, I would drop some weight. I think my body finally figured it out.
Here's my experiment this week. Fourty-four points a day is 308 for the week. I rarely eat more than half of the additional 35 WW allows. I'm going to eat those this week, too. Sunday, I ate 39.5. But Monday-Wednesday I was over 50 (by a lot Tues and Wed). I have 134 left for the week, so that should be plenty. Three days at 44 is 132. So I'll have the same in the week, but maybe my body will think things have changed because of the last couple of days.
If it doesn't work, it's only slowed me down. That's all. So what the hell. I'll let you know how it goes.
I've been reading a lot about weight loss. I'm particularly interested in how contrary to evolution that it is. We have adapted to put on weight easily so when times are tough, we don't die. Losing weight is contrary to that adaptation. (If you don't believe in evolution, I can't help you.) In fact, to lose weight consistently, you don't have to cut calories much. A couple of hundred a day will do it, depending on where you start.
Plateaus happen, I understand, when one's body finally tumbles to the fact that there's less food coming in than there was before. Then it slows the metabolism to adjust. The way to deal with this is to keep moving and to--wait for it--eat more.
More?
More.
You can also alter how much you eat by day, while keeping the same total points/calories for the week. That's called, I think, the zigzag.
I have been eating 44 WW points (and some of the weekly, depending on the week) since April. At 58 calories per point (average), that's about 2550 calories. That's plenty. But according to a couple of calculators I have used online, my BMR is more like 2700 calories. This means even in a coma, I would drop some weight. I think my body finally figured it out.
Here's my experiment this week. Fourty-four points a day is 308 for the week. I rarely eat more than half of the additional 35 WW allows. I'm going to eat those this week, too. Sunday, I ate 39.5. But Monday-Wednesday I was over 50 (by a lot Tues and Wed). I have 134 left for the week, so that should be plenty. Three days at 44 is 132. So I'll have the same in the week, but maybe my body will think things have changed because of the last couple of days.
If it doesn't work, it's only slowed me down. That's all. So what the hell. I'll let you know how it goes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)